Plan B – Effects of the Eventual Delay of Bulgaria’s Joining the EU

Accession treaty art. (39):

If, on the basis of the Commission's continuous monitoring of commitments undertaken by Bulgaria and Romania in the context of the accession negotiations and in particular the Commission's monitoring reports, there is clear evidence that the state of preparations for adoption and implementation of the acquis in Bulgaria or Romania is such that there is a serious risk of either of those States being manifestly unprepared to meet the requirements of membership by the date of accession of 1 January 2007 in a number of important areas, the Council may, acting unanimously on the basis of a Commission recommendation, decide that the date of accession of that State is postponed by one year to 1 January 2008.

The European Union as a reform stimulator

Most of the economic reforms in Bulgaria have been made not because of the inner confidence of the people who carried them out, but due to the outer pressure mainly from international financial institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Their basic medium of forcing the government to carry out reforms was the so crucial to the financial and macroeconomic stability of the country. However, as time has passed, the importance of the funding from international financial institutions began to decrease, and so did the ability of the IMF and the World Bank to provoke reforms in Bulgaria.

Gradually the EU took the place of the IMF and the World Bank as a reform stimulator, and part of the more recent reforms have been made under its pressure. The willingness of the Bulgarian people and politicians for Bulgaria to become member of EU, gave the EU the power to push the reform process. The problem is that the more certain Bulgaria's EU membership becomes, the less influence on reforms the EU has. When a certain country becomes a member of the EU, the inner consensus necessary for the reforming process disappears, along with the purpose of the reforms –EU-accession.

Using the preventive clause (1), the EU tries to solve this problem, stimulating Bulgaria and Romania to continue their reforms. This clause keeps both countries in check and prevents them from thinking that they are already members of the EU and that there is no need to change any more. It turned out that the lack of inner confidence in the Bulgarian society, concerning the necessity of the reforms, should be compensated by outer pressure. In that case the preventive clause (especially if it urges forward the reforming process without coming into power) could have a good effect on the country. But it's coming into power will have both positive (reform stimulation) and negative effects such as the inability to profit by the advantages which an eventual EU membership would give and of course the risk of further postponement.

Free migration

Free movement of people inside the EU is one of the biggest advantages that EU membership can give to a country. Unfortunately, the economic problems in some European countries which are members of the EU led to restrictions in migration for new member countries from the former Soviet Union. Despite this, three of the old members (Ireland, Great Britain and Sweden) and two of the new ones (Malta and Cyprus) apply the free movement principle towards all member countries and will probably apply it towards Bulgaria after its EU accession.

Free movement of people ensures competition on the labor market, with all of its advantages. On a limited national labor market it is more possible that a shortage of certain types of labor occurs, with the resulting problems to the economy following it, compared to an opened international labor market. Besides citizens of a certain country have the opportunity to gain know-how and experience in a foreign land and later apply it in their motherland (provided that a suitable business environment exists). Also important is the fact that part of the money earned by Bulgarian emigrants is a sizable and steadily increasing income for their families back home, forming national income bigger than the educational and the healthcare budget of the country.

Postponing the accession of Bulgaria to the EU will lead to a decrease in the opportunity for Bulgarian workers to work legally abroad in countries that do not hinder free migration. This means that many people will continue to work illegally abroad or will try to emigrate illegally, thus increasing expenses.

Not joining the EU will definitely have a negative impact on free people movement in Bulgaria. It will be cushioned by the fact that many countries do not admit workers from former Soviet Union countries to their labor market. The only adequate response politicians in Bulgaria could give to this situation is to create ? business-friendly environment, thus stimulating the opening of well paid working places. This will, to a certain extent, reduce the negative effect of an EU-accession delay.

 European funds

Expected funds after joining the EU:

Financial package 2007 – 2009

Mln.  Euro (in 2004 prices)

2007

2008

2009

Structural reforms

539

759

1 002

Agricultural development

183

244

306

Provisional Instrument for facilitation of the cash flows and assistance of the Shengen agreement’s realization

121.8

59.1

58.6

Nuclear energy safety(2)

70

70

70

Total

804.8

1 132.1

1 436.6

Source: Bulgaria and Romania accession treaty; Report on the results of Bulgaria and Romania accession negotiations.

 

Bulgaria's payments

1) Since the date of their accession Bulgaria and Romania pay the following sums, according to their share capital, carried in for the registered capital, defined in art. (4) from the By- laws of the European Investment Bank (3).

Bulgaria
EUR               14 800 000
Romania EUR               42 300 000

 

These sums are paid in eight equal installments maturing on 31.05.2007, 31.05.2008, 31.05.2009, 30.11.2009, 31.05.2010, 30.11.2010, 31.05.2011 and 30.11.2011.

2) Payment for the EU budget – 1.24% of GDP.

 

Utilization of European funds

Disadvantages:

•  Lack of experience and preparation for using the EU funds – most probably in the first years the money for agricultural development will be inefficiently spent (for creating governing administrative structures for example and not for helping growers)

•  Change in motive of entrepreneurs – they are attracted to the funded business spheres, not because of the opportunity to do business more cheaply, but only to take advantage of the funds.

•  The increase in government administration, needed for assimilating funds, will lead to an increase in government spending and in corruption risk.

•  One of the basic requirements for receiving EU funds is co-financing from the state budget (at least 25%). On the one hand, this means that part of the taxpayers' money will be spent on financing different society groups. On the other hand, according to Ministry of Finance data, it is apparent that despite the increase in assimilation percentage EU funds are not completely utilized.

 

 

Financial assimilation of pre-accession programs

 

ISPA

SAPARD

RHARE 2003

May 2004

16.41%

16.29%

18.51%

December 2004

29.13%

40.95%

56.29%

May 2005

41.12%

n.a

62.58%

Source: Ministry of finance, financial assimilation ofs pre-accession programs, selected periods

Advantages:

  • The eventual introduction and use of new technologies will increase productivity of labor, which is lower than the EU average, especially in agriculture.

 

As a conclusion, we can summarize – the expected EU funding for the year 2007, which comes up to 804.8 mln. EUR (1573.6 mln. BGN), will be spent on different society groups. If we take the 2004 state budget over fulfillment data into consideration (1500 mln. BGN), we can expect that in 2005 it will be at least 1000-1500 mln. BGN. In that case, it is completely possible that Bulgaria could continue its reforms without European funding. In order for the country to sustain its rate of economic growth it is necessary (and feasible) that the overall tax burden would be reduced. Thus the effect will be enhanced, no unnecessary expenses and increase in government administration will be made, entrepreneurship and employment will be stimulated.

Trade

Free movement of goods , as far as it is not hindered as migration, is an extremely important advantage following from the EU membership. It eliminates possible monopolies on the domestic market already existing in Bulgaria, due to import limitations on certain commodities. At the same time, it eases the export of domestic products, most of all agricultural ones, which are currently not freely traded. From this point of view, the eventual delay of Bulgaria's EU accession will slow down the process of integration of the country's economy to the world economy and will result in an inability to fully take advantage of labor division.

Investment

Postponement of the EU accession is the topic considered to be fundamental before the general elections in Bulgaria. It is presented only as harmful to the economy, considering the benefits from joining the EU. But there are certain negative effects of the EU membership, which should also be taken into consideration.

The accession to the EU means that the harmonization between Bulgarian and European legislation is complete and some regulations that are not necessarily good for the business are approved. During the process of integration, part of the legislation was adopted without evaluating its effect on Bulgarian companies. The principle in the EU when proposing new regulations or


Related publications.